Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Lona Leann Grosshart Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
lona-leann-grosshart
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Lona Leann Grosshart

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 13, 2021

Lona Leann Grosshart vs. Kansas City Power & Light Company

Appellant

Lona Grosshart appealed the dismissal of her claims for fraudulent concealment, strict liability, and negligence against Kansas City Power & Light Company, alleging heavy metal exposure from a power plant. The appellate court affirmed the dismissal of claims related to Kansas exposure due to the Kansas statute of repose and the fraudulent concealment claim for failure to allege a duty to disclose. However, it reversed and remanded the strict liability and negligence claims concerning alleged 2016 Missouri exposure, finding they were not barred by the statute of repose and causation was adequately pleaded.