Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Marc Kenneth Taormina Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
marc-kenneth-taormina
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Marc Kenneth Taormina

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 21, 2021

Susan Ann Taormina vs. Marc Kenneth Taormina

Respondent

Susan Taormina appealed a judgment denying her contempt motion and granting Marc Taormina's motion to terminate maintenance following their divorce. The trial court terminated maintenance retroactively, finding changed circumstances due to Wife's cohabitation. The appellate court affirmed the termination of maintenance, agreeing that Wife's cohabitation constituted a substitute for marriage and a substantial change in circumstances. However, it reversed the retroactive termination date, holding that maintenance could only be modified from the date of service of the motion. Consequently, the court also reversed and remanded the denial of Wife's contempt motion for reconsideration.