Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MARK ALBERT FRIEND, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
mark-albert-friend-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MARK ALBERT FRIEND, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 29, 2020

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. MARK ALBERT FRIEND, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Mark Albert Friend appealed his convictions for various sexual abuse crimes against two victims, challenging the exclusion of evidence and his conviction for child molestation in the second degree. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's decision to preclude evidence regarding abuse by the victims' father, finding no abuse of discretion. However, the court reversed the conviction for child molestation in the second degree, as the victim was over twelve years old, and remanded the case for entry of a conviction for child molestation in the third degree and resentencing.