Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Mary E. Wilson Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
mary-e-wilson
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Mary E. Wilson

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 19, 2021

Mary E. Wilson, Respondent, vs. Thomas E. Murawski, Appellant.

Respondent

Thomas Murawski appealed the trial court's judgment dissolving his marriage to Mary Wilson, challenging various aspects including the division of assets and debts, maintenance, child custody, and child support orders. The appellate court affirmed in part and reversed in part. It reversed the maintenance award for certain child-related expenses, the modification of a stipulated child custody arrangement without required findings, and an order for retroactive child support. The court affirmed the trial court's rulings on other financial matters, property valuations, and debt divisions.