Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Matthew D. Vacca, Respondent/Cross- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
matthew-d-vacca-respondent/cross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Matthew D. Vacca, Respondent/Cross-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Matthew Vacca sued the Missouri Department of Labor and Brian May for retaliation after he was terminated from his administrative law judge position, seeking actual and punitive damages including future lost wages. The circuit court denied the defendants' request to apply judicial estoppel, which would have precluded Vacca's claim for future lost wages due to inconsistent statements about his ability to work in prior disability applications and dissolution proceedings. The Supreme Court of Missouri reversed the judgment for damages, holding that the circuit court abused its discretion by refusing to apply judicial estoppel, and remanded the case for further proceedings on other potential damages.