St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Matthew F. Edler and Andrea Edler Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
matthew-f-edler-and-andrea-edler
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Real Estate ConsultationCall About A Real Estate Claim

Cases Involving Matthew F. Edler and Andrea Edler

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Matthew and Andrea Edler appealed a judgment ordering them to remove a dock they built on Main Lake, an artificial lake owned by the Incline Village Board of Trustees, and awarding attorney's fees to the Trustees. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the order to remove the dock, holding that riparian rights do not arise from owning land abutting an artificial lake without an easement or other grant. However, the Court reversed the award of attorney's fees, concluding that the Edlers' actions did not constitute "special circumstances" justifying such an award.

Real EstateCivil Litigation