Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Medical Plaza One, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
medical-plaza-one-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Medical Plaza One, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 29, 2018

Medical Plaza One, LLC vs. Jess Davis and Douglas Square II, LLC

Appellant

Jess Davis and Douglas Square II, LLC appealed a judgment from a dispute with Medical Plaza One, LLC concerning a settlement agreement and a ground lease. The trial court had incorporated jury verdicts and determined court-tried equity claims, ordering specific performance and denying Appellants' requested equitable relief. The appellate court affirmed the judgment as modified, holding that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction and that MPO adequately exercised a purchase option despite non-strict compliance due to waiver. The court also found that denying Appellants' equitable remedies was proper due to their prior breach and modified the judgment to correct a double recovery for MPO.