Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MEGAN B. WITHERSPOON Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
megan-b-witherspoon
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MEGAN B. WITHERSPOON

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Mar 29, 2022

MEGAN B. WITHERSPOON, Respondent vs. JUAN THURMOND, Appellant

Respondent

Juan Thurmond (Father) appealed the circuit court's judgment determining his child support arrearages, arguing the original paternity judgment was void ab initio for lack of personal jurisdiction. The circuit court found Father had waived this defense by actively participating in subsequent litigation without raising the issue. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Father's actions, including filing motions seeking affirmative relief, constituted a general appearance and waiver of the personal jurisdiction defense, even if the original judgment was entered without it.