Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Megan Lizabeth Schwandner Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
megan-lizabeth-schwandner
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Megan Lizabeth Schwandner

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jan 26, 2021

Megan Lizabeth Schwandner, Respondent, vs. Director of Revenue, Appellant.

Respondent

The Director of Revenue appealed the trial court's judgment reinstating Megan Lizabeth Schwandner's driving privileges, which were suspended after her arrest for driving while intoxicated. The trial court had excluded breath sample results because the zip code for the breath analyzer's ethanol-gas mixture supplier differed from the regulation. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that a zip code discrepancy does not invalidate the supplier's approval under the relevant regulation, and thus the breath sample results should have been admitted.