Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MFA OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
mfa-oil-company-plaintiff
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment LawCivil LitigationCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment ConsultationCall About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving MFA OIL COMPANY, Plaintiff-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Kevin Martin appealed the trial court's judgment enforcing a covenant not to compete with his former employer, MFA Oil Company. Martin argued the covenant was overbroad, superseded by a later employment agreement, and a prohibited restraint of trade under section 431.202, RSMo. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding the covenant reasonable as modified, not superseded, and that section 431.202 did not apply to this type of non-compete agreement.

Employment LawCorporate LawCivil Litigation