Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael E. Kohn and Catherine E. Kohn Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-e-kohn-and-catherine-e-kohn
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael E. Kohn and Catherine E. Kohn

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 18, 2018

Michael E. Kohn and Catherine E. Kohn vs. Missouri Department of Revenue

Appellant

Michael and Catherine Kohn appealed the dismissal of their petition for declaratory judgment against the Missouri Department of Revenue (DOR). The Kohns argued that the DOR's tax lien for their 2001 income taxes was barred by a five-year statute of limitations, contending that the filing of a tax lien constituted an "action." The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal, holding that the filing of a tax lien is not a civil "action" subject to the statute of limitations and that the statutory scheme for tax collection does not violate separation of powers or due process.