Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MICHAEL MOORE, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-moore-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MICHAEL MOORE, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 11, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. MICHAEL MOORE, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Michael Moore appealed his convictions for statutory rape and statutory sodomy, arguing the trial court erred by excluding the victim's first forensic interview. Moore contended the recording was admissible under a statute, to show the victim's demeanor, or under the rule of completeness. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, declining plain error review for the statutory and completeness arguments due to lack of preservation. The court found no abuse of discretion in excluding the full interview for demeanor evidence, as Moore had sufficient opportunity to impeach the victim's credibility through other means.