Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MICHAEL MOORE, PAULA ROBERTSON, and NANCY SALZMAN Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-moore-paula-robertson-and-nancy-salzman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MICHAEL MOORE, PAULA ROBERTSON, and NANCY SALZMAN

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Appellants, former employees of Respondents, sought class certification and medical monitoring for alleged lung impairment from exposure to metalworking fluids. The circuit court denied class certification and granted summary judgment for Respondents. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying class certification due to lack of typicality and superiority, given the nature of the alleged present injuries. The court also affirmed summary judgment on the underlying tort claims because Appellants failed to identify material facts, and reiterated that medical monitoring is not a standalone cause of action in Missouri.