Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael P. Byrne Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-p-byrne
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael P. Byrne

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 27, 2023

Orin Wallace, and Donna Wallace, Respondents, v. Michael P. Byrne, Appellant.

Appellant

Orin and Donna Wallace sought a declaratory judgment regarding an easement over Michael Byrne's property, which they had used for access since 1994. The trial court declared the existence and location of an express easement, awarded damages, injunctive relief, and attorney fees due to Byrne's interference. Byrne appealed, challenging the easement's existence and location, and the application of a balancing test. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding that an express appurtenant easement existed and its location was established by description and use, and that a balancing test was inapplicable. The case was remanded for the trial court to calculate attorney fees on appeal for the Wallaces.