Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Michael Willerton, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
michael-willerton-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Michael Willerton, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Date unavailable

3CM Holdings, LLC, Appellant, v. Michael Willerton, et al., Respondents.

Respondent

3CM Holdings, LLC, appealed a judgment in favor of Richard and Susan Willerton on its petition to recover damages under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA). 3CM alleged that Michael Willerton fraudulently transferred property to Richard and Susan to shield assets from creditors. The circuit court found Michael acted with fraudulent intent but entered judgment for Richard and Susan, concluding they purchased the property in good faith and for reasonably equivalent value. The appellate court affirmed, finding the circuit court did not misapply the law or render a judgment against the weight of the evidence.