Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Midland States Bank and Midland States Bancorp, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
midland-states-bank-and-midland-states-bancorp-inc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Midland States Bank and Midland States Bancorp, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Larry Rice appealed the circuit court's dismissal with prejudice of his action against Midland States Bank and Midland States Bancorp, Inc. The appellate court found procedural confusion regarding whether the circuit court ruled on Rice's initial petition or his subsequently-filed amended petition. Citing Rule 55.33(a), the court determined the amended petition became operative as a matter of law, rendering the initial petition abandoned. The appellate court reversed the judgment and remanded for further proceedings, as the circuit court either erred by ruling on an abandoned petition or by dismissing the amended petition without a proper motion against it.