Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Midway Arms, Inc. d/b/a Midway, USA Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
midway-arms-inc-d/b/a-midway-usa
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Midway Arms, Inc. d/b/a Midway, USA

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Michael Erwin vs. Midway Arms, Inc. d/b/a Midway, USA

Respondent

Michael Erwin, an employee, appealed from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's final award regarding his workers' compensation claim against Midway Arms, Inc. The Commission had reversed an Administrative Law Judge's award for past medical benefits and sanctions against the employer. The appellate court reversed the Commission's denial of past medical benefits, reinstating the ALJ's award, finding that the employee's demands for treatment were sufficient without medical evidence and the employer's refusal triggered liability. However, the court affirmed the Commission's decision to deny sanctions, concluding the employer's conduct did not rise to the level of an abuse of discretion.