St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Midwest Emergency Medical Services, P.C. and Brandie a. Niedens, M.D. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
midwest-emergency-medical-services-pc-and-brandie-a-niedens-md
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Wrongful Death
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Wrongful DeathCivil LitigationPersonal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Wrongful Death ConsultationCall About A Wrongful Death Claim

Cases Involving Midwest Emergency Medical Services, P.C. and Brandie a. Niedens, M.D.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Shelly Denise Mansil, as personal representative of Johnna Hughes's estate, sued Midwest Emergency Medical Services and Dr. Brandie Niedens for the wrongful death of Hughes's baby, alleging medical negligence. After a jury verdict for the plaintiff, the defendants appealed the trial court's denial of their motion for new trial, which challenged the admission of expert testimony on pecuniary losses. The appellate court affirmed, finding that the expert's testimony regarding damages under RSMo 537.090 met foundational requirements and its weight was properly left to the jury.

Wrongful DeathCivil LitigationPersonal Injury