Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Midwest Lodging, LLC, and Montgomery Bank, N.A., and Shrinay Construction, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
midwest-lodging-llc-and-montgomery-bank-na-and-shrinay-construction-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Midwest Lodging, LLC, and Montgomery Bank, N.A., and Shrinay Construction, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Almat Builders and Remodeling, Inc. appealed the circuit court's entry of summary judgment in favor of Midwest Lodging, LLC and Montgomery Bank, N.A., concerning a mechanics' lien and a quantum meruit claim arising from hotel construction work. The appellate court affirmed the summary judgment on the mechanics' lien, concluding Almat's lien statement was not a "just and true account" due to its failure to credit for uncompleted work. However, the court reversed the summary judgment on the quantum meruit claim, finding the defendants' arguments insufficient to negate the claim and the record lacking proof of full payment to prevent unjust enrichment. The quantum meruit claim was remanded for further proceedings.