St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Missouri Coalition for the Environment and Thomas J. Sager Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
missouri-coalition-for-the-environment-and-thomas-j-sager
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Family LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Missouri Coalition for the Environment and Thomas J. Sager

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

The Missouri Coalition for the Environment and Thomas J. Sager challenged Senate Bill No. 35, codified as section 34.030, RSMo Supp. 2017, alleging it violated several procedural requirements of the Missouri Constitution. They claimed violations of the single-subject, clear-title, original-purpose, and full-text amendment requirements, as well as the prohibition against special or local laws. The circuit court granted summary judgment for the State. The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed, finding that SB 35 complied with all challenged constitutional procedural requirements.

Family LawCivil Litigation