Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Missouri State Treasurer, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
missouri-state-treasurer-as-custodian-of-the-second-injury-fund
Cases Shown
7
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Employment LawInsurance Bad FaithWorkers' CompensationCivil LitigationPersonal Injury

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Employment ConsultationCall About A Employment Claim

Cases Involving Missouri State Treasurer, as custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Gregory Phelps appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of his workers' compensation claim for permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. Phelps argued the Commission misinterpreted and misapplied section 287.220.3 regarding qualifying preexisting disabilities. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, finding no error in its interpretation of the statutory requirements for a compensable preexisting injury or the definition of "the opposite extremity." The court also found Phelps's third point regarding the combination of injuries to be moot.

Workers' CompensationCivil Litigation