Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

MISSOURI STATE TREASURER as CUSTODIAN of the SECOND INJURY FUND, Additional Party- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
missouri-state-treasurer-as-custodian-of-the-second-injury-fund-additional-party
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving MISSOURI STATE TREASURER as CUSTODIAN of the SECOND INJURY FUND, Additional Party-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

David Casey appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's decision, which reversed an Administrative Law Judge's award of permanent total disability (PTD) benefits from the Second Injury Fund (SIF). Casey argued the Commission erred in denying PTD benefits by misinterpreting the 50-week threshold for combining preexisting disabilities and by failing to consider expert opinions. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's denial, finding that the issue of combining multiple disabilities was moot because one preexisting disability met the 50-week threshold, and upholding the Commission's credibility determination regarding the combination of the qualifying right-knee disability and the primary injury.