Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Office of Administration, et al., Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
office-of-administration-et-al
Cases Shown
3
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil LitigationCorporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Litigation ConsultationCall About A Litigation Claim

Cases Involving Office of Administration, et al.,

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 3, 2020

Tri-County Counseling Services, Inc, et al. vs. Office of Administration, et al.

Respondent

Tri-County Counseling Services, Inc. (Family Facets), an unsuccessful bidder, appealed a judgment denying its challenges to state contract awards. Family Facets argued it was improperly denied sheltered workshop preference points and that the trial court erred in dismissing several counts for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Family Facets' arrangement did not qualify for the preference and that it failed to exhaust administrative remedies by not protesting all relevant sites and issues.

Corporate LawCivil Litigation