Missouri Case Party

Osage Mobile Home Park, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: osage-mobile-home-park-llc
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Civil Litigation

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Civil Litigation Real Estate Corporate Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Osage Mobile Home Park, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 9, 2019

Osage Mobile Home Park, LLC vs. Lisa Jones (Smothers)

Appellant

Lisa Jones appealed a judgment from the circuit court awarding Osage Mobile Home Park, LLC, damages and restitution of premises in an unlawful detainer action. Jones argued on appeal that the trial court misapplied a statute requiring 60 days' notice to vacate a mobile home lot. The appellate court dismissed the appeal, holding that Jones's argument was unpreserved for review because it was raised for the first time on appeal.

Real Estate Civil Litigation Corporate Law