St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Patricia Thibeault, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
patricia-thibeault-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Family LawCivil LitigationReal Estate

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Patricia Thibeault, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Aug 20, 2024

Claymont Development, LLC, Appellant, vs. Patricia Thibeault, et al., Respondents.

Respondent

Claymont Development, LLC, sought injunctive and declaratory relief against the City of Wildwood regarding development moratoria and to compel the issuance of development permits for a residential subdivision. The trial court granted summary judgment for the City. On appeal, the Eastern District affirmed, holding that Claymont's claims were moot because the challenged moratoria had expired or been repealed, and the development plan had changed without proper resubmission, making it impossible for the court to grant effectual relief.

Family LawReal EstateCivil Litigation