Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Patrick S. Flynn, in his individual capacity, Appellant/Cross- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
patrick-s-flynn-in-his-individual-capacity-appellant/cross
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Patrick S. Flynn, in his individual capacity, Appellant/Cross-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Karla Allsberry, an elected circuit clerk, sought a declaration that Presiding Judge Patrick S. Flynn lacked authority to indefinitely suspend her and requested injunctive relief to be restored to her office. The circuit court declared Judge Flynn lacked such authority but denied injunctive relief, stating it could not enjoin another circuit judge. The Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the declaratory judgment, holding that an indefinite suspension constituted a de facto removal, which is beyond a presiding judge's administrative authority. The Court reversed the denial of injunctive relief, concluding that a circuit court has the power to grant injunctive relief against another circuit judge acting in an administrative capacity, and remanded the case for entry of the requested relief.