Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Paul Fregeau Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
paul-fregeau
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Paul Fregeau

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jun 28, 2019

Paul Fregeau vs. Carol Fregeau

Appellant

Paul Fregeau appealed the trial court's judgment dissolving his marriage to Carol Fregeau, specifically challenging a $150,000 cash equalization payment to Wife. Husband argued the payment improperly divided his non-marital teacher retirement account. The appellate court, however, dismissed the appeal for lack of a final judgment, finding that the trial court's written judgment failed to distribute all marital property and debt identified in the evidence, thus depriving the appellate court of jurisdiction. The case was remanded for the trial court to enter a final judgment addressing all property and debt.