Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Paul Hasty Jr., et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
paul-hasty-jr-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Paul Hasty Jr., et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jul 21, 2020

Day Advertising, Inc., et al vs. Paul Hasty Jr., et al

Respondent

Day Advertising, Inc., Heartland Title Services, Inc., and James C. Day (Appellants) appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to Paul Hasty, Jr. and Hasty and Associates, LLC (Respondents) on Appellants' claims of legal malpractice and fraudulent misrepresentation. Appellants alleged Respondents mishandled prior legal malpractice suits and a bankruptcy matter, and that James Day suffered individual damages. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's summary judgment, finding insufficient evidence to support Appellants' claims and that the Heartland claim was time-barred.