Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Paul Joseph Mottet Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
paul-joseph-mottet
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Paul Joseph Mottet

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 12, 2021

Paul Joseph Mottet vs. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri

Appellant

Paul Mottet's driver's license was administratively revoked by the Director of Revenue for refusing a chemical test. Mottet sought judicial review, and the trial court entered judgment against the Director when the prosecuting attorney failed to appear. The Director moved to set aside the judgment, arguing it was void because Chapter 56 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri required the prosecutor's presence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's denial of the motion, holding that Chapter 56's general provisions do not apply to driver's license revocation actions under Chapter 302, and the Director, as a civil litigant, was not denied due process.