Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

RANDALL LEE ABNEY Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
randall-lee-abney
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving RANDALL LEE ABNEY

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jan 17, 2024

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent vs. RANDALL LEE ABNEY, Appellant

Appellant

Randall Abney was convicted of neglect of a child and second-degree murder for failing to provide adequate nutrition to his ten-year-old daughter, leading to her death. On appeal, Abney argued the trial court erred by admitting hearsay statements from a detective and a circuit manager, violating his confrontation rights, and by admitting evidence of prior bad acts. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, affirmed the conviction, finding no error in the admission of the challenged testimony and no prejudice from the prior bad acts evidence.