Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

RAYMOND CROSS, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
raymond-cross-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving RAYMOND CROSS, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Jul 31, 2023

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. RAYMOND CROSS, Defendant-Appellant

Appellant

Raymond Cross appealed his conviction for felony resisting arrest, arguing there was insufficient evidence that he knew or reasonably should have known Sergeant Borders was arresting him when he fled. The trial court had denied his motions for judgment of acquittal. The appellate court affirmed the conviction, finding that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, was sufficient for a rational jury to conclude Cross knew or should have known he was being arrested.