Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Rhamir Jaheim Washington Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
rhamir-jaheim-washington
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Rhamir Jaheim Washington

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / May 21, 2024

State of Missouri vs. Rhamir Jaheim Washington

Respondent

Rhamir Jaheim Washington appealed his conviction for third-degree domestic assault, challenging the trial court's decision to allow the State to file a second substitute information alleging persistent offender status. He argued that his prior convictions, used for enhancement, were unconstitutional due to lack of counsel at critical stages. Washington also contended the trial court erred by denying jury sentencing instructions and by denying his motion to dismiss for improper preliminary hearing, asserting a jurisdictional defect. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, finding no error in the trial court's rulings, particularly noting that Washington could not collaterally attack his prior convictions.