Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Richard W. Cook, Jr. and Dawn R. Cook Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
richard-w-cook-jr-and-dawn-r-cook
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Richard W. Cook, Jr. and Dawn R. Cook

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 16, 2019

ROH Farms, LLC vs. Richard W. Cook, Jr. and Dawn R. Cook

Respondent

ROH Farms, LLC appealed the denial of its petition for specific performance of two real estate contracts with Richard and Dawn Cook for the sale of farmland and a residence. The trial court denied specific performance on multiple grounds, including that ROH Farms anticipatorily breached the contracts and failed to establish it was ready, willing, and able to perform. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, concluding that ROH Farms did not prove its readiness to perform, as the closing documents listed a third party, Harris Ventures, Inc., as the buyer, and ROH Farms had not assigned its interest.