Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert Casey, Employee/Dolores Murphy, Appellant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-casey-employee/dolores-murphy-appellant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Robert Casey, Employee/Dolores Murphy, Appellant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Robert Casey died from mesothelioma, and his widow, Dolores Murphy, pursued a claim for enhanced workers' compensation benefits against his last employer, E.J. Cody Company, Inc., and its insurer, Accident Fund Insurance Company. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarded benefits to Ms. Murphy but excluded Mr. Casey's eight adult children. On appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed the Commission's decision as modified, holding that the insurer was liable for the enhanced benefits, the relevant statute was constitutional as applied, and Mr. Casey's eight children should be included as beneficiaries in the final award.