Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert E. McDonald Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-e-mcdonald
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Criminal Law ConsultationCall About A Criminal Law Claim

Cases Involving Robert E. McDonald

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Mar 30, 2021

State of Missouri vs. Robert E. McDonald

Respondent

Robert McDonald was convicted of multiple counts of statutory sodomy, statutory rape, and incest. The trial court sentenced him as a predatory sexual offender on several counts, using an act for which he was also convicted in Count 1 as the predicate offense. McDonald appealed, arguing that an act cannot be "previously committed" under section 558.018.5(2) RSMo if it is part of the current charges. The appellate court affirmed, holding that an act is "previously committed" if it occurred prior to the offense for which the enhanced sentence is imposed, even if it is also a currently charged offense.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation