Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ROBERT L. HALL, M.D. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-l-hall-md
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving ROBERT L. HALL, M.D.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Dec 16, 2024

ROBERT L. HALL, M.D., Appellant vs. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Respondent

Appellant

Robert Hall, M.D., appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to UNUM Life Insurance Company of America and denial of his own motion for summary judgment. Dr. Hall sought lifetime total disability benefits under a policy rider, arguing he was "totally disabled" prior to his age-60 policy anniversary, the policy's definition of total disability was ambiguous, or a genuine dispute of material fact existed. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no merit in Dr. Hall's arguments regarding policy interpretation or the existence of a factual dispute.