Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert M. Sharon Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-m-sharon
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Robert M. Sharon

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Feb 4, 2020

American Family Mutual Insurance Company vs. Robert M. Sharon

Respondent

Robert Sharon appealed a declaratory judgment in favor of American Family Mutual Insurance Company, which had found no duty to defend or indemnify its insureds (the Schwenzers) against Sharon's claims of negligent misrepresentation and unlawful merchandising practices related to water damage in a home he purchased from them. The appellate court reversed and remanded, concluding that Sharon's claim for post-sale water damage resulting from negligent misrepresentation could constitute a covered "occurrence" under the homeowners' policy. The court further found that the trial court erred in applying the owned-property, expected-or-intended, and contract-liability exclusions to bar coverage for this specific claim, thus establishing American Family's duty to defend.