St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

ROBERT ROLFES and SUSAN ROLFES Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-rolfes-and-susan-rolfes
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Real EstateCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving ROBERT ROLFES and SUSAN ROLFES

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Neil B. Steiner and Deborah G. Steiner appealed the trial court's judgment dismissing their petition against Robert and Susan Rolfes concerning real and personal property. The Rolfes filed a motion to dismiss the appeal due to numerous Rule 84.04 briefing violations. The appellate court sustained the Rolfes' motion, finding the Steiners' brief contained fatal deficiencies regarding the statement of facts, points relied on, standard of review, and argument section, and consequently dismissed the appeal.

Real EstateCivil Litigation