Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Root Insurance Company Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
root-insurance-company
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Root Insurance Company

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Brian S. Wetzel vs. Root Insurance Company

Respondent

Brian S. Wetzel sued Root Insurance Company for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay after his vehicle was totaled and Root denied his insurance claim. A default judgment was entered against Root, which then filed a motion to set aside the default judgment, arguing good cause and a meritorious defense. The circuit court denied Root's motion. On appeal, the Western District affirmed the circuit court's denial, holding that Root failed to demonstrate good cause to set aside the default judgment because its evidence was insufficient to overcome the circuit court's discretion. The court also denied Wetzel's motion for attorney's fees on appeal.