Missouri Case Party

ROSE FORD Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: rose-ford
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Personal Injury

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Personal Injury Corporate Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Personal Injury Consultation Call About A Personal Injury Claim

Cases Involving ROSE FORD

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Feb 19, 2020

ROSE FORD, Respondent vs. SKAGGS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, Appellant

Respondent

Rose Ford, injured in a car crash, received treatment from Skaggs Chiropractic, LLC, and signed an "Assignment & UCC Lien" purporting to waive statutory limits on medical liens. After Ford settled her personal injury claim, the trial court applied Missouri's medical lien statutes to determine the amount owed to Skaggs, limiting its recovery. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the medical lien statutes provide the exclusive remedy for healthcare providers seeking payment from personal injury settlements, superseding any contractual agreements. The court also found Skaggs failed to preserve its argument regarding insufficient evidence of attorney's fees.

Personal Injury Corporate Law Civil Litigation