Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Rylan Brantl Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
rylan-brantl
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Rylan Brantl

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 22, 2020

Rylan Brantl vs. The Curators of the University of Missouri

Appellant

Dr. Rylan Brantl sued The Curators of the University of Missouri for breach of contract and related state-law claims following the termination of his neurosurgery residency. The trial court dismissed Dr. Brantl's first amended petition with prejudice, finding his claims were barred by Missouri's five-year statute of limitations. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the claims accrued when Dr. Brantl received notice of his termination, not the formal termination date. The court further determined that federal supplemental jurisdiction tolling provisions did not apply to claims dismissed on Eleventh Amendment immunity grounds, and Missouri's savings statute could not revive time-barred actions.