Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Sallie Cunningham, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
sallie-cunningham-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Sallie Cunningham, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 16, 2024

Keith W. Lay, et ux., Respondents, vs. Sallie Cunningham, et al., Appellants.

Appellant

Keith and Wanda Lay sued Curt and Sallie Cunningham, successor trustees of a family trust, seeking a prescriptive easement for ingress and egress across the Cunningham Property. The circuit court granted the Lays a thirty-foot-wide prescriptive easement and injunctive relief. On appeal, the Cunninghams challenged the findings of adverse use, the width of the easement, and the injunctive relief. The appellate court affirmed the judgment establishing the prescriptive easement but modified it by deleting the unnecessary injunctive relief.