Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Sally Bacon Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
sally-bacon
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Sally Bacon

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 30, 2021

Sally Bacon, Appellant, v. Jeffrey Friedman, et al., Respondent.

Appellant

Sally Bacon appealed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment to Jeffrey Friedman and others, which found her claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit, and unjust enrichment time-barred. Bacon alleged an oral agreement for the sale of her archery business, arguing it was an installment contract and thus not subject to the five-year statute of limitations. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the factual disputes were not material to the statute of limitations defense and that Bacon's vague oral agreement did not constitute an installment contract, making her claims time-barred.