Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Samantha Kelley Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
samantha-kelley
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Employment Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Samantha Kelley

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Samantha Kelley sued the Missouri Department of Corrections for sexual harassment under the MHRA, alleging a hostile work environment and the Department's failure to take remedial action. A jury awarded Kelley actual and punitive damages, and the trial court added attorneys' fees with a 1.5 multiplier. The Department appealed, challenging the submissibility of the case, the punitive damages award, and the fee multiplier. The appellate court affirmed the judgment in its entirety, finding no error in the trial court's rulings, and remanded the case for a determination of appellate attorneys' fees.