Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Samantha Smith Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
samantha-smith
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Samantha Smith

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

Samantha Smith vs. Kevin C. Smith and Angela Wilson-Smith

Appellant

Mother, Samantha Smith, appealed a "Family Access Judgment and Judgment of Contempt" which found in favor of Grandmother regarding visitation rights and contempt. Mother argued that her proposed visitation schedule, included in a relocation letter, superseded the prior dissolution judgment, and that the trial court erred in altering custody. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that the relocation statute does not automatically make a proposed visitation schedule operative without a court order or agreement, and that the trial court's order did not modify custody but merely clarified Grandmother's visitation rights.