Missouri Case Party

Sarah Steelman, Et Al., and Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID: sarah-steelman-et-al-and-biotech-medical-software-inc
Cases Shown: 1
Top Practice Route: Corporate Law

Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate Law Civil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Consultation Call Ott Law Firm

Cases Involving Sarah Steelman, Et Al., and Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 26, 2021

Metrc, LLC vs. Sarah Steelman, Et Al., and Bio-Tech Medical Software, Inc.

Respondent

Metrc, LLC appealed a declaratory judgment that its contract with the State of Missouri for a medical marijuana seed-to-sale tracking solution did not permit it to charge industry participants for proprietary RFID tags beyond the firm, fixed price. The trial court found the contract unambiguous and that a later-promulgated regulation was irrelevant to its interpretation. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that the contract, read as a whole, required Metrc to include all necessary costs, including the RFID tags, within the firm, fixed price.

Corporate Law Civil Litigation