Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

SAXON HOLDINGS TRUST and ERIC FARRAN and LEANN FARRAN as its Trustees Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
saxon-holdings-trust-and-eric-farran-and-leann-farran-as-its-trustees
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving SAXON HOLDINGS TRUST and ERIC FARRAN and LEANN FARRAN as its Trustees

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Beverly Barlow sued Saxon Holdings Trust and its trustees, Eric and LeAnn Farran, to quiet title to a parcel of land. Both parties claimed title to the disputed property, with conflicting surveys regarding the property line described in their respective deeds. The trial court found the deed descriptions ambiguous, resolved the ambiguity in favor of Barlow, and also found she had proven adverse possession. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the trial court did not err in finding a latent ambiguity in the deeds or in resolving that ambiguity in Barlow's favor based on substantial evidence.