Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Scott Hannah Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
scott-hannah
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Scott Hannah

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Jan 15, 2019

Scott Hannah vs. Laura Hannah; Missouri Secretary of State

Appellant

The Missouri Secretary of State appealed a dissolution of marriage judgment that required a Safe at Home program participant to disclose the physical address of her minor child to the other parent. The participant, Ms. Hannah, feared for her safety and that of her child, both enrolled in the program. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that the circuit court erred by ordering disclosure without complying with the Safe at Home statute's procedural requirements, which shield such addresses.