Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Sharon Hickman Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
sharon-hickman
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Sharon Hickman

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Nov 13, 2018

Michael Reuter vs. Sharon Hickman

Respondent

Sharon Hickman, a deputy circuit clerk, was terminated for poor job performance. An administrative review committee (DRC/CCBC) found her dismissal unreasonable and not based on just cause, ordering her reinstatement. Michael Reuter, the Circuit Clerk, sought judicial review, and the circuit court reversed the administrative decision. The appellate court reversed the circuit court's judgment, holding that the administrative agency's decision was supported by competent and substantial evidence, thus reinstating Hickman's employment.