Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Shelbie E. Campbell Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
shelbie-e-campbell
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Shelbie E. Campbell

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Date unavailable

In Re: The Marriage of Brian L. Campbell vs. Shelbie E. Campbell

Respondent

Brian Campbell (Father) appealed the amended dissolution judgment, which granted Shelbie Campbell (Mother) sole legal and physical custody of their two minor children. Father argued the trial court erred by misapplying section 452.375 to rebut the presumption of joint physical custody and by finding that extended contact with him was not in the children's best interests, claiming a lack of substantial evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding that the evidence, including Father's emotional abuse of Mother, work schedule, and lack of financial support, sufficiently rebutted the presumption and supported the custody determination.